The king of spoof movies first attempt was a grand slam.
Blazing Saddles starring Cleavon Little, Gene Wilder, Harvey
Korman, Slim Pickens and Mel Brooks who of course also directed the spoof. Blazing
Saddles makes fun of one of the biggest genres of film during the time it was
made. Westerns were on their way out in the 70’s as the predominant type of
film, and the genre was ripe for a spoof. Does the comedy still hold up to an audience
today? Can kids or at least people of a latter generation appreciate the social
commentary the movie provides? What age should kids be introduced to the
language and story told in the film?
Blazing Saddles if released today would have gotten a PG-13
rating rather than an R, or maybe not with its use of one word in particular.
The movie if made today probably wouldn’t have been able to use the word, but I
think the way it is used in the film makes a point. Mel Brooks recently talked
about writing the script and getting Richard Pryor’s opinion on its use. He
asked Pryor if it was okay for him to say it, and Pryor’s response was you
aren’t using it Mel, the bad guys are. Pryor has a credit for the screenplay on
the film and was originally cast as the sheriff, but the Warner Brothers was
wary of using him in the role. There is little other language to be concerned
about in movie other than the word I’m being so cryptic about. I think the use
of the word is a good conversation starter with older children about its
history, and all the baggage behind it. When kids are introduced to the movie
it should be discussed why people shouldn’t use the word, or at least why my
particular skin pigment shouldn’t. I think Blazing Saddles uses it to great
affect and uses it in a way to highlight why it shouldn’t be used. It is played
for jokes in the film, but in a biting satirical way, to highlight how hurtful
it can be. The scene with the old women using it and then apologizing is a
fantastic example of how it is used well.
Little else in the movie garners a nod as problematic for
children. The action and violence are not a factor for letting younger kids
watch. The ending fight sequence does have fist fighting, but it is so over the
top it is no worse than any Saturday morning cartoon, or at least Saturday
morning cartoons from my childhood. I love the looney tunes gag Bart uses
against the Mongrel, and it makes me laugh every time I watch the movie. At
every turn Bart figures out a way to overcome his situation and make the best
out of it. He beats the Mongrel not by strength but by smarts, and continually
does this throughout the movie. He disproves many stereotypes along the way, or
at least stereotypes during the time the movie was made.
My biggest worry about introducing anyone to Blazing Saddles
is them not understanding many of the jokes found in the film. The movie is a
spoof on the Western Genre, and the entire story is a gag on the typical plot
told in the classic Westerns of the fifties and sixties. Since Westerns are not
a popular genre of film today many of the jokes poking fun at the clichés may
fall flat on a modern audience. It might be worthwhile to introduce kids to
other classic Western films, and then have them see Blazing Saddles to get more
of the jokes. It could be a barrier for
enjoyment for people who have not watched many Westerns. I do still think there
is enough in the movie to be enjoyed by all. People of any age can laugh at the
iconic campfire scene.
What shouldn’t be lost on any generation, and is still
prevalent today, is the commentary the film has on social issues. I don’t want
to get political, but I’ll simply say the country has come a long way even
since this film was made with racial issues. To deny this is to deny facts. We
have an African American president and many things have improved with racial
issues since the 70’s. On the flip side to say there aren’t still prevailing problems
which need to be addressed is also to deny facts. This is one reason why this
film should still be watched. The biting
social commentary the movie pokes fun at should be examined. Even when this
film was made it would have been odd to see a black sheriff in some
communities. It probably would even be odd in a few still today. This is the
one aspect of the movie which holds up and will continue to hold up. Hopefully though
this social commentary will eventually be lost on later generations and have to
be explained and researched to be understood.
With all of this being said, I think kids should be
introduced to Blazing Saddles at an older age to fully grasp everything going
on in the film. An older audience is needed to properly understand its
historical context, and apply it to current events. Yes it is a silly western
spoof, but the film does have things to say. The fact that many of the western
jokes may be lost on a current audience is one reason I think older kids or
people in general will get more out of the film. I think a person could be
introduced Blazing Saddles anywhere from 13-16 years old depending on the kid.
A fan of history or a fan of the Western genre may have more fun with the movie
before others would. I love this movie, and it gets better with every viewing.
The performances are great and I’m excited to eventually introduce my boys to
the movie.
It is my first visit to your blog, and I am very impressed with the articles that you serve. Give adequate knowledge for me. Thank you for sharing useful material. I will be back for the more great post. http://1234movies.me
ReplyDelete